(October 1, 2012 - December 31, 2012)
In cases where MSDE has been informed that a hearing decision is being appealed in accordance with Section 615(i) of IDEA 2004, an asterisk (*) is placed next to the OAH Case #. The civil or district court number of the case is provided when available.
Public Agency |
OAH Case # ______________ |
Decision Date |
Hearing Requested By |
Issues |
Anne Arundel County Public Schools |
12-H-AARU-26191 |
10/26/2012 |
Public Agency |
Evaluation/Assessment-Behavioral, IEP Implementation-accommodations, aids & services |
Decision Summary ____________ |
The ALJ concluded that the parents “did not carry their burden to prove” their allegations and, as a result, their due process complaint was dismissed. |
12-H-AARU-35466 |
12/4/2012 |
Public Agency |
IEP Implementation-FAPE |
The ALJ concluded that the IEP developed by the AACPS, which requires the provision of instruction in a special education classroom, within a comprehensive elementary school, would provide the student a FAPE. |
Public Agency |
OAH Case # ______________ |
Decision Date |
Hearing Requested By |
Issues |
Baltimore County Public Schools |
12-H-BCNY-43752 |
12/21/2012 |
Public Agency |
IEP Implementation-transportation |
Decision Summary ____________ |
The ALJ concluded the decision by the school system not to provide the student with transportation between two separate high school programs during the school day did not amount to a denial of a FAPE to the student. |
Public Agency |
OAH Case # ______________ |
Decision Date |
Hearing Requested By |
Issues |
Montgomery County Public Schools |
12-H-MONT-32713 |
10/26/2012 |
Public Agency |
Placement Determination |
Decision Summary ____________ |
The ALJ concluded that the amount of speech-language therapy required by the IEP was reasonably calculated to provide a FAPE and that the school system had not violated any ‘stay-put’ requirements of the law. |
12-H-MONT-32722 |
10/3/2012 |
Public Agency |
Determination of Eligibility, Stay-put, FAPE |
The ALJ concluded that the school system did not err when it determined that the student was not a student with a disability requiring special education under the IDEA. |
Public Agency |
OAH Case # ______________ |
Decision Date |
Hearing Requested By |
Issues |
Prince George's County Public Schools |
12-H-PGEO-32444 |
12/20/2012 |
Public Agency |
IEP Implementation-Placement |
Decision Summary ____________ |
The ALJ concluded that, through the provision of compensatory services, the PGCPS remediated the failure to provide the student with a FAPE, and has provided the student with a FAPE since th e violation was corrected. |
|
|
|
|
Division of Special Education/Early Intervention Services Maryland State Department of Education |
200 West Baltimore Street |
|
|
|
|
|