- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
 Divisions
  Overview
  Academic Policy & Innovation
  Accountability, Assessment, and Data Systems
  Career and College Readiness
  Communications, Partnerships, and Grants
  Curriculum, Assessment & Accountability
  Educator Effectiveness
  Early Childhood Development
  Finance
  Information Technology
  Library Services
  Office of the State Superintendent
  Rehabilitation Services
  Special Education and Early Intervention
     Overview
     Individuals With Disabilities Education Act
     Information
     Early Intervention and Preschool Special Education
     Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act of 2004
     Mod-HSA Procedures and Processes
     Interagency Rates
     Upcoming Events
     Fact Sheets
     Family Support and Dispute Resolution Branch
        Hearing Decisions
           2010
           2011
           2012
        Complaint Letters
     IDEA
     State Interagency Coordinating Council
     Policy and Accountability Branch
     Interagency Collaboration Branch
     Specialized Services Branch
     Resource Management and Monitoring Branch
     Programmatic Support and Technical Assistance
  Student, Family, and School Support
Divisions
Divisions > Special Education and Early Intervention > Family Support and Dispute Resolution Branch > Hearing Decisions > 2015
Due Process Hearing Decisions - FY15 - 1st Quarter

(July 1, 2014 - September 30, 2014)

In cases where MSDE has been informed that a hearing decision is being appealed in accordance with Section 615(i) of IDEA 2004, an asterisk (*) is placed next to the OAH Case #.  The civil or district court number of the case is provided when available.

Public Agency OAH Case #
______________
Decision Date
Hearing Requested By Issues
Baltimore City Public Schools
14-H-CITY-07867
08/01/2014
Parent/Guardian  IEP Implementation-Placement, ESY Determination
Decision Summary
____________

The ALJ concluded that the student's IEP and placement were appropriate, that the IEP was implemented, and that the student did not require ESY services. The ALJ further concluded that the parent had the ability to participate in the IEP process and there was no denial of a FAPE to the student.


Public Agency OAH Case #
______________
Decision Date
Hearing Requested By Issues
Carroll County Public Schools
14-H-CRRL-22224
09/25/2014
Parent/Guardian  ESY Determination, IEP Implementation-Placement
Decision Summary
____________

The ALJ concluded that the student's IEPs and placement were reasonably calculated to provide the student with a FAPE, and that the student did not require ESY services. As a result, the ALJ denied the parent's request for nonpublic placement.


Public Agency OAH Case #
______________
Decision Date
Hearing Requested By Issues
Harford County Public Schools
14-H-HARF-16208
08/07/2014
Parent/Guardian  IEP Implementation-Placement
Decision Summary
____________

The ALJ concluded that the student's IEP and placement was appropriate and therefore denied parents' request for funding at a nonpublic placement.


Contact Information
Maryland State Department of Education
Division of Special Education/Early Intervention Services
200 West Baltimore Street
Baltimore, MD 21201
MSDE Privacy Statement Disclaimer  | Copyright © 2003 MSDE