|
(January 1, 2015 - March 31, 2015)
In cases where MSDE has been informed that a hearing decision is being appealed in accordance with Section 615(i) of IDEA 2004, an asterisk (*) is placed next to the OAH Case #. The civil or district court number of the case is provided when available.
| Public Agency |
OAH Case #
______________ |
Decision Date |
Hearing Requested By |
Issues |
Baltimore City Public Schools |
14-H-CITY-34141 |
1/30/2015 |
Parent/Guardian |
IEP Implementation-Placement, Placement/LRE/complainant requesting less restrictive |
Decision Summary
____________ |
The ALJ concluded that the student's IEP failed to provide the student a FAPE in the least restrictive environment (LRE). Therefore, the ALJ ordered the school system to assume the cost of the student's nonpublic placement. |
| Baltimore City Public Schools |
14-H-CITY-27815 |
3/20/2015 |
Parent/Guardian |
Nonpublic Placement/Tuition Reimbursement, IEP Implementation-Placement |
| Decision Summary |
The ALJ concluded that the student's proposed IEP and placement was appropriate to provide the student with a FAPE and, as a result, denied the parents' request for continued placement in a nonpublic school at the school system's expense. |
| Public Agency |
OAH Case #
______________ |
Decision Date |
Hearing Requested By |
Issues |
|
Howard County Public Schools |
14-H-HOWD-33335 |
2/13/2015 |
Parent/Guardian |
Compensatory Services, Nonpublic Placement/Tuition Reimbursement |
Decision Summary
____________ |
The ALJ concluded that the IEP was reasonably calculated to offer the student a FAPE. Therefore, the ALJ denied the parents' request for compensatory education for previous school years and denied their request for reimbursement of the cost of tuition at a nonpublic school. |
| Public Agency |
OAH Case #
______________ |
Decision Date |
Hearing Requested By |
Issues |
|
Montgomery County
Public Schools |
14-H-MONT-19118 |
1/2/2015 |
Parent/Guardian |
IEP Implementation-Placement, Placement/LRE/complainant requesting less restrictive |
Decision Summary
____________ |
The ALJ concluded that the IEP was reasonably calculated to meet the student's unique needs and to enable the student to receive educational benefit in the least restrictive environment. Therefore, the ALJ further concluded that the parents are not entitled to reimbursement for the cost of the student's private school tuition. |
| Public Agency |
OAH Case #
______________ |
Decision Date |
Hearing Requested By |
Issues |
MSDE/JSE |
14-H-DJS-41126
|
1/13/2015 |
Parent/Guardian |
Placement Determination |
Decision Summary
____________ |
The ALJ granted the school system's motion for summary judgment following her conclusion that there was no dispute of material fact. |
| Public Agency |
OAH Case #
______________ |
Decision Date |
Hearing Requested By |
Issues |
Talbot County Public Schools |
14-H-TALB-27705
|
2/20/2015 |
Parent/Guardian |
Compensatory Services |
Decision Summary
____________ |
The ALJ concluded that the student was provided with a FAPE and as a result, was not entitled to compensatory services. |
|
|
|
|
Maryland State Department of Education
Division of Special Education/Early Intervention Services |
| 200 West Baltimore Street |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|